Exposure Management
5 Min

Rethinking Automated Penetration Testing: Beyond Credential Discovery

The rise of automated penetration testing solutions has been hailed as a game-changer, promising to revolutionize how organizations defend against cyber threats. However, a closer examination reveals a stark reality: many of these solutions are stuck in a loop, repeatedly focusing on a single use case—credential discovery and reuse—without pushing the boundaries to explore more advanced and varied attack vectors.

These tools, designed to simulate cyberattacks to identify vulnerabilities, have traditionally been heralded for their effectiveness in detecting credential discovery and misuse—a prevalent threat vector. However, the cybersecurity community is reaching a consensus that the scope of these automated solutions is too narrow, often overshadowed by an excessive focus on credential-related vulnerabilities. This situation reflects a significant oversight, as modern cyber threats encompass a far broader and more sophisticated range of tactics than credential compromise alone.


Credential discovery and its subsequent misuse certainly represent critical vulnerabilities, serving as a gateway for numerous cyberattacks. This focus has led to automated penetration testing tools being tailored to identify such threats efficiently. Yet, this specialization has inadvertently fostered a limited perspective on cybersecurity, with other critical vulnerabilities receiving less attention. The consequence is a security strategy that, while strong against credential theft and misuse, may be blind to other, equally devastating cyber threats.


The reliance on automated tools that primarily address credential vulnerabilities highlights a pressing issue: the necessity for these solutions to evolve. Today’s cyber threats require defenses that are as diverse and sophisticated as the attackers themselves. From advanced persistent threats (APTs), zero-day exploits, to intricate phishing schemes, the variety of attack vectors is vast. Thus, there is a growing demand for automated penetration testing solutions to broaden their capabilities, incorporating cutting-edge technologies such as AI and machine learning. These advancements can enable tools to not only identify a wider array of vulnerabilities but also to predict potential future threats and adapt their testing strategies accordingly.

In essence, while the identification of credential misuse remains an essential aspect of cybersecurity defenses, it should not dominate the discourse to the exclusion of other threats. The future of cybersecurity lies in the development and deployment of automated penetration testing solutions that are as dynamic and multifaceted as the cyber threats they aim to combat. Such tools should not only address the wide spectrum of vulnerabilities present in modern IT environments but also anticipate and mitigate emerging threats.


As the cybersecurity field continues to mature, the demand for automated penetration testing solutions that go beyond credential discovery is clear. By embracing a broader perspective and investing in more sophisticated technologies, the cybersecurity community can ensure more robust protection against the complex array of threats facing organizations today.

Related posts

BLOG
Exposure Management

Email Security Controls: Levels of Security & Preventable Attack Scenarios

Over the last few weeks, we have received numerous support requests from our enterprise customers and had interactions with teams regarding early notification alerts sent from our side about their application servers' susceptibility to the HTTP 2 Rapid Reset DDoS attack. It was interesting to listen to the Blue team's stance and views on the shared responsibility aspect of DDoS mitigation. There is a widespread misbelief that any single-layer protection, whether at the ISP level or gateway, offers adequate defense against all types of DDoS attacks. Most large enterprises have multi-disciplinary, defense-in-depth practices in place to prevent such attacks. Nonetheless, it was notable that we were able to demonstrate the actual impact to customers with meaningful proof of concepts (POCs) despite the presence of many such security solutions. While the most favored and recommended method of remediation is the actual patching of the application server, there may be issues related to application compatibility or other factors that could delay this action. Therefore, it is crucial to verify the presence and effectiveness of security controls at various levels to establish a virtual patching defense for the affected application servers. A multi-layered DDoS defense strategy integrates measures from ISPs, WAFs/WAAPs, CDNs, ALBs, SLBs, and Application Servers to provide comprehensive protection

See NST Assure in action! Contact us for a Demo

email us : info@nstcyber.ai
Proactively predict, validate & mitigate risks