Exposure Management
5 Min

How to Tackle Cloud-Based Covert Channel Threats ?

The emergence of cloud-based covert channels represents a significant challenge in cybersecurity. These channels exploit legitimate cloud resources to establish stealthy communication paths for malicious purposes, such as data exfiltration and command control. Here are some notable techniques and corresponding mitigation strategies:

Cloud-based Covert Channel Techniques:
  1. Data Hiding in Storage Services:
    • Steganography: Hiding malicious content within files on platforms like Dropbox or Google Drive.
    • File Metadata: Using file metadata fields for encoding secret information.
    • Deduplication Abuse: Leveraging cloud storage data deduplication for information leakage.
  2. Command and Control via Serverless Functions:
    • Lambda Functions: Misusing serverless platforms (e.g., AWS Lambda) for remote triggering or data exfiltration.
    • Event-Driven Communication: Exploiting cloud event-driven architectures for covert communication.
  3. Resource Utilization as Signaling Channels:
    • CPU/Memory Spikes: Using resource usage fluctuations to transmit data covertly.
    • Network Traffic Patterns: Encoding data in the timing or size of cloud service network requests.
  4. API Abuse for Data Exfiltration:
    • Exfiltration via Legitimate APIs: Manipulating standard cloud APIs for unauthorized data transfer.
    • Custom APIs as Communication Tunnels: Creating APIs that appear legitimate but serve as covert channels.

Effectively addressing cloud-based covert channel threats requires a multifaceted and dynamic strategy, where Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) plays a crucial role. CTEM, particularly with its external zero-knowledge approach, greatly enhances the ability to detect and respond to these threats. It complements Cloud Security Posture Management tools, which are essential for real-time monitoring of cloud resource usage, API activities, and data access. This combination ensures a more comprehensive surveillance against covert activities.

Behavior-Based Analysis also gains an edge with CTEM, as it aids in pinpointing subtle behavioral anomalies that might indicate covert communications. This is particularly effective when CTEM’s external perspective is integrated, offering insights that internal monitoring might miss.

Data Leakage Prevention (DLP) tools, crucial for monitoring and controlling sensitive data flows, are similarly bolstered by CTEM. It provides an external view, identifying potential data exfiltration paths and vulnerabilities that internal tools might overlook.

Furthermore, the synergy of Continuous Monitoring and Threat Intelligence with CTEM’s ongoing external threat analysis is invaluable. It keeps organizations ahead of the evolving tactics used in covert channel attacks, allowing for swift and effective adaptation of security measures.

In summary, the integration of Continuous Threat Exposure Management into cloud security strategies transforms the approach to combating these sophisticated cyber threats. It ensures a more rounded, proactive, vigilant, and adaptive defense mechanism, essential for protecting cloud environments and sensitive data in an ever-changing threat landscape.

Related posts

BLOG
Exposure Management

Email Security Controls: Levels of Security & Preventable Attack Scenarios

Over the last few weeks, we have received numerous support requests from our enterprise customers and had interactions with teams regarding early notification alerts sent from our side about their application servers' susceptibility to the HTTP 2 Rapid Reset DDoS attack. It was interesting to listen to the Blue team's stance and views on the shared responsibility aspect of DDoS mitigation. There is a widespread misbelief that any single-layer protection, whether at the ISP level or gateway, offers adequate defense against all types of DDoS attacks. Most large enterprises have multi-disciplinary, defense-in-depth practices in place to prevent such attacks. Nonetheless, it was notable that we were able to demonstrate the actual impact to customers with meaningful proof of concepts (POCs) despite the presence of many such security solutions. While the most favored and recommended method of remediation is the actual patching of the application server, there may be issues related to application compatibility or other factors that could delay this action. Therefore, it is crucial to verify the presence and effectiveness of security controls at various levels to establish a virtual patching defense for the affected application servers. A multi-layered DDoS defense strategy integrates measures from ISPs, WAFs/WAAPs, CDNs, ALBs, SLBs, and Application Servers to provide comprehensive protection

See NST Assure in action! Contact us for a Demo

email us : info@nstcyber.ai
Proactively predict, validate & mitigate risks