NST Cyber - Blogs - How Do SDKs and APIs Pose Security Risks in Mobile Apps?

How Do SDKs and APIs Pose Security Risks in Mobile Apps?

Exposure Management

5 Min

How Do SDKs and APIs Pose Security Risks in Mobile Apps?

NST Research Team

Software Development Kits (SDKs) and Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) play crucial roles in the architecture of contemporary mobile applications. These tools grant developers access to a suite of pre-configured functionalities, including analytics, advertising capabilities, and integration with social media platforms. However, incorporating SDKs and APIs into mobile applications is not without its challenges, particularly in terms of security. Below is a summary of the prevalent security risks encountered when utilizing SDKs and third-party APIs in mobile application development.

Asset 1

While SDKs and APIs offer invaluable tools for app development, it's crucial to acknowledge and address the inherent security risks they bring. Analyzing these risks involves thorough evaluation of the SDKs and APIs, considering factors such as data access, permissions required, and the trustworthiness of the provider. This analysis is vital to preemptively identify potential vulnerabilities and mitigate them effectively. Moreover, continuous monitoring of these risks is equally important. The digital landscape is constantly evolving, and new threats emerge regularly. Ongoing monitoring ensures that any new vulnerabilities are detected and addressed promptly, maintaining the security and integrity of the mobile application over time. This proactive approach to risk analysis and monitoring is essential in safeguarding user data and maintaining trust in the application. The Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) approach is indispensable for organizations aiming to bolster their cybersecurity measures. It provides a reliable framework for detecting and managing a range of security risks, including those associated with external integrations such as Software Development Kits (SDKs) and third-party APIs within mobile applications. CTEM operates on the principle of zero-knowledge detection, consistently monitoring and analyzing the threat landscape to identify, validate, and prioritize potential vulnerabilities. This proactive and comprehensive strategy is essential for maintaining robust security defenses in the ever-evolving digital realm. The NST Assure Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) platform empowers your organization to continuously assess its security posture.

Related posts

Exposure Management

The Hidden Risks of Coexisting Malicious Apps in Non-Rooted Android Devices

The common belief that limiting app installations to non-rooted Android devices ensures comprehensive security is a significant oversight in enterprise mobile security strategy. Although non-rooted devices come with inherent security features, they remain prone to sophisticated cyber threats, particularly from malware-infected or malicious applications that might not require root access to perform damaging activities.

Exposure Management

Protecting the "Invisible" Attack Surface of APIs with Exposure Management

APIs come in various forms, each with unique security challenges. Public APIs are exposed to the internet and often poorly secured, making them prime targets for attackers. Internal APIs are used within an organization but can be accessed by insiders or through compromised systems, posing internal threat risks. Third-Party APIs integrate with external services, which might have varying security postures, leading to potential security gaps. Legacy APIs are older and might not have been updated to incorporate modern security practices, making them vulnerable to exploitation. Additionally, Unsecured Endpoints are APIs lacking proper authentication, authorization, or encryption, offering easy entry points for attackers.

Exposure Management

Email Security Controls: Levels of Security & Preventable Attack Scenarios

Over the last few weeks, we have received numerous support requests from our enterprise customers and had interactions with teams regarding early notification alerts sent from our side about their application servers' susceptibility to the HTTP 2 Rapid Reset DDoS attack. It was interesting to listen to the Blue team's stance and views on the shared responsibility aspect of DDoS mitigation. There is a widespread misbelief that any single-layer protection, whether at the ISP level or gateway, offers adequate defense against all types of DDoS attacks. Most large enterprises have multi-disciplinary, defense-in-depth practices in place to prevent such attacks. Nonetheless, it was notable that we were able to demonstrate the actual impact to customers with meaningful proof of concepts (POCs) despite the presence of many such security solutions. While the most favored and recommended method of remediation is the actual patching of the application server, there may be issues related to application compatibility or other factors that could delay this action. Therefore, it is crucial to verify the presence and effectiveness of security controls at various levels to establish a virtual patching defense for the affected application servers. A multi-layered DDoS defense strategy integrates measures from ISPs, WAFs/WAAPs, CDNs, ALBs, SLBs, and Application Servers to provide comprehensive protection

See NST Assure in action! Contact us for a Demo

email us : info@nstcyber.ai

Proactively predict, validate & mitigate risks